Brewing political pots
By Cris Diaz / September
11, 2006
THE political pots in Cagayan de Oro and the province of
Misamis Oriental are starting to brew with some surprising turn of events. Although there are political alignments that are
starting to be formed, the political climate is still too fluid to take a firmer or more determined form.
This is also the time for curious minds to play on the
political mix-ups. In Cagayan de Oro, the quest for the the mayoral post is an endless guessing game. The grapevine is full
of reports that Atty. Antonio Soriano, a former vice mayor, is running for mayor. But he will have to settle first with former
vice mayor John Elizaga who has reportedly gone to talk to Sen. Aquilino Pimentel Jr. so that he could get the party endorsement
for the mayoral post. John Elizaga is eyeing the mayoral post!
But reports are heavy also that Atty. Cecilio "Jun" Pepito
is running for any position that Atty. Tony Soriano will run for. Thus, if Tony runs for mayor, Jun will file his candidacy
for mayor. If Tony files for the lone congressional seat, Jun will run for Congress. I’m not sure what made Jun, if
this is true, vie for the position that Tony Soriano bats for. A personal vendetta? Only Jun Pepito can answer that.
And Councilor Zaldy Ocon is also reported to have the support
of Atty. Manolo Tagarda Sr., a former mayor and father of incumbent vice mayor Atty. Michelle Tagarda, for the mayoral post.
Atty. Edgar Cabanlas, Atty. Maya Enteria, Atty. Ramon Tabor,
Atty. Alvin Calingin, Atty. Pablo Magtajas and Atty. Rogelio Bagabuyo are also reported to be interested in the congressional
seat. Add Atty. Noel Beja as a contender, too, with Carmen barangay chair Rolando Uy and Councilor Benjamin "Benjo" Benaldo
for congressional contenders. It is also reported that Councilor Benjo has the support Mikey Arroyo, a former classmate at
Ateneo and a son of GMA.
Surely, former councilors Bob Ocio and Roy Raagas are intending
a comeback. So will former councilor Prexy Elipe.
In the province of Misamis Oriental, Rep. Danilo Lagbas
will be defending his turf against congressional wannabes with board member Henry Clyde Abbott leading the pack. There’s
also a report that Balingasag mayor Felix Borromeo, who is in his third and last term, will take a shot at the congressional
seat of the 1st District of Misamis Oriental. And in the 2nd District where Atty. Jun Baculio is in his third and last term,
the congressman is eyeing the position of governor and his son is the one he wants to succeed him for his congressional seat
while his sister remains mayor of El Salvador town.
But Mayor Bambi Emano of Tagoloan town may run for vice
governor and that would leave incumbent Vice Gov. Julio Uy no option but to run for Congress in the 2nd District against the
son of Jun Baculio. And, as the news have it, former governor Antonio Calingin will also run for the seat against Bambi Emano.
Wouldn’t that be interesting? The circus is starting the show as the political brew boils some more.
This does not yet include to which position Mayor Dongkoy
Emano will throw his political hat into. And this is where the final word would come from. Board members Norris Babiera and
Oliver Actub would surely toe the line of their mentor, the political-scientist Dongkoy Emano. And then Gov. Oscar Moreno
would have to align his forces given the Emano-Baculio factor. Surely Mayor Felix Borromeo would support the quests of Rep.
Jun Baculio since they are first cousins. That would force incumbent Balingasag Vice Mayor Alex Quina to align with either
Gov. Moreno or Mayor Dongkoy Emano. The tendency is for Alex Quina to go with Gov. Oca Moreno. But how about his long and
tested loyalty to Mayor Dongkoy Emano? Will he shed it in favor of Gov. Moreno? That is a political question Atty. Quina must
soon face.
But the final determinant in the 2007 elections is still
the party with the logistics to sustain a campaign. Mayor Emano’s group has the perceived resources. So are the camps
of Gov. Moreno and Rep. Jun Baculio. And the rest are just taking a small bite but not able to partake of the whole meal.
Unfortunately true for the political opposition but politics is always about money.
And come Christmas 2006, we will already know who would
be caroling at your doorsteps. Some will bring goodies, others only tall tales that you have already heard in elections past.
With Christmas just around the corner, the elections would not come far behind. Watch out for it! It will be a very interesting
year to come.
This driver is a robber
By Joe Pallugna / September
4, 2006
AT noontime two Fridays ago, August 25th in Cagayan de
Oro City, a father and a daughter tandem bringing heavy bags to the Lumbia airport flagged down a taxicab.
It was a white-painted taxi with license plates KVJ-613.
Driven by a monkey but looking like a man, the taxi driver took on board his passengers and drove onwards.
The monkey of a taxi driver then harangued his passengers
telling them that the taxi drivers in Cagayan de Oro City do not put on their taxi meters when they are bound to Lumbia airport.
Instead he demanded a pakyaw of P200!
Could you believe that? A robbery in broad daylight!
When his passengers refused to submit to the robbery in
broad daylight, the driver of the taxicab with license plates KVJ-613 stopped his cab and angrily demanded that his passengers
get off his cab.
Harassed and intimidated, but angry and in a hurry not
to miss their plane, the passengers got off, put their heavy bags on the street under the scorching heat of the sun, waited
for another taxicab with an honest cabbie and grudgingly went on their way.
Now, this incident is for Mayor Dongkoy Emano and Atty.
Darimbang of LTFRB-Region 10 to investigate.
This is not an isolated incident. This monkey driving a
white taxicab with license plates KVJ-613 is only one of a gang of monkeys not only preying on helpless passengers but also
destroying the very good image that Mayor Emano has been desperately trying to project for our City of Golden Friendship.
This is the very tip of the iceberg of abuses by taxi drivers
that Atty. Darimbang must not only investigate unlike what the Senate does (in aid of legislation). Investigate and do nothing
about it, I don’t believe Atty. Darimbang would do. This is an incident which Atty. Darimbang, the good and dedicated
public official that he is, must investigate and act swiftly on and cancel the LTFRB franchise of the taxicab operator, or
suspend it until full compliance with the law is assured.
Now, Porcawa Dia of the LTO-Region 10 should also act swiftly
and confiscate the driver’s license of that monkey who obtained a driver’s license––most certainly
in an irregular manner. For how could the LTO issue a driver’s license to a monkey? Dia should act fast to avoid a repeat
of this monkey robbing his passengers in broad daylight. That monkey should never be issued a driver’s license!
Really, Mayor Donkoy Emano, in his weekly radio programs,
should announce the creation of an office or a Task Force with hotline numbers so that abuses by taxi drivers, jeepney, motorela
and trisikad drivers could immediately be reported and acted upon with dispatch. This is really serious and should be given
immediate attention. For how many taxi drivers have been mulcting their passengers to and from the airport in the past year?
So many!
But why are these monkeys still robbing their passengers
in broad daylight? Because they have been emboldened with their illegal acts, arrogant and determined as they are, since they
have never been apprehended, not prosecuted, and their licenses not confiscated. As if no one bothered them.
Another way to prevent these abuses by taxi drivers is
to set up checkpoints midway to the airport and for the police to ask the passengers how much they were asked to pay for fare
and to see if the taxi meters are running and to inform the passengers clearly that in Cagayan de Oro City the passengers
never pay more than what the taxi meters show as the legal fare.
And the LTFRB-Region 10 should be quick to impose penalties
on the taxi operators, and the LTO-Region 10 should be serious and swift in canceling the driver’s license of the monkey
pretending to be a driver who acts worst than a robber.
And Mayor Emano should assign a public official to oversee
this program of taking monkeys off the taxis, of taking robbers off the steering wheels of public transports.
For only then will Cagayanons and our visitors, our tourists
and investors, the poor and the hapless passengers, will really believe that our government agencies are functioning and are
not inutile as what the monkeys think of them.
I meant the monkeys driving the taxis. Including the monkey
driving the white taxicab with license plates KVY-613.
Let’s see who the monkey is in the days to come.
Let’s see.
On building and burning bridges
By Joe Pallugna / August
14, 2006
AS Cagayan de Oro City moves into the next two decades,
there is nothing comparable to the extreme necessity and outright usefulness than the bridges that cross our great river.
And as in any civilization, development always start on
riverbanks. Rivers are not only sources of food for fishermen and irrigation water for farmers, they also provide for the
best way of travel, transport and trade.
Any great city in the world has a great river. New York,
Shanghai, Manila, Hongkong, Paris, London and all the great cities of the world have major rivers. And when they pour out
into the sea, these great cities have great ports for ships to dock into and unload and load their cargoes and passengers.
This is so true with Cagayan de Oro. We have a great river
and a great port area. So we have this great opportunity.
So Mayor Dongkoy Emano can never be wrong in building bridges
over Cagayan de Oro River with earnest to capitalize on the mode of water transport. As one realizes, rivers and seas constrict
the means to transport if left to themselves. Siltation inevitably ensues. Yet, these waterways can be exploited to the fullest
if used as major transways.
By building bridges, the city is forced to make a comprehensive
plan for dike building along the riverbanks, for dredging to avoid siltation and uncontrollable flooding and river-overflowing
and the general plan of river-control and management.
Along these plans include beautification of the river embankments
and the riversides where people could jog, play, watch the water flow and keep their peace. They then appreciate more the
beauty of our river.
Thus building bridges across Cagayan de Oro River is a
very wise and timely idea.
After the Ysalina Bridge, the second is the Marcos Bridge,
third is the Pelaez Bridge, fourth is the Puntod Bridge, fifth is the Carmen-Macasandig Bridge, and sixth is the J.R. Borja-Carmen
Bridge. From two bridges to six bridges in less than 10 years! That’s a great feat, really.
Only one with a vision for development and progress could
think of that. Not even the past three mayors of our city did ever envision building bridges over our great river. Not one
even accomplished one beyond getting millions of pesos for a feasibility study that never got off the ground––although
all the P23 million have already disappeared days before election day in 1998.
And bridges really are that important. That’s why
Israel bombed all the bridges leading to and out of Lebanon and why the US forces bombed all the bridges vital to travel in
the invasion of Iraq.
Bridges really are that important. I’m sure the Spanish
government thought of this importance when they decided to finance the JR Borja-Carmen Bridge project.
With six bridges in all, the comprehensive plan for river
control, dredging, dike-building, siltation management, boat-traffic, safety standards and economic infrastructure-building
will be finalized. This is the end-result of all these bridge-building binge of Mayor Emano.
I’m sure there is no better way. Building bridges
has always been desired by civilizations past. From the Tigris and Euphrates rivers did civilization begin. From Cagayan de
Oro River will our city move into the next century.
Anyone who criticizes the city government in the issue
of bridge-building are just sourgrapes, attention-seekers or just plain ignorant of it. Many had their opportunity in the
past to make our city great and all they thought of were projects they could have probably made money of. No one made a determined
effort to build bridges like Mayor Emano did. And not only a determined effort but a sustained and strong determination to
bring these bridges to reality.
With these passable bridges now, two more to be completed
in the next couple of months and another bridge courtesy of Spain, we are on the road to progress six times faster.
Let us commend Mayor Emano for these bridges––if
only, that is the best we could extend by way of gratitude or recognition. He deserves it.
But then again, there is always politics in other people’s
mind to prevent them from commending a good plan already implemented––as in these bridges.
Nevertheless, if you don’t, many will, including
me. I commend Mayor Emano for all his visions on bridge-building. I hope he builds some more bridges. Unlike those politically
opposed to him who burned bridges in their minds and hearts, broke friendships in the name of politics. Like many you-all-know-who.
Sulog, what?
By Joe Pallugna / August
4, 2006
THAT was the reaction of Atty. Manuel Ravanera when I asked
him last Wednesday morning in court why he did not attend the meeting of some opposition leaders at the Philtown Hotel last
Saturday. In a mocking manner, Atty. Ravanera said, "By the name Sulog alone, it is going nowhere but pa-salop na (going
into sunset). Tell them to change that name." Well, that was his immediate reaction.
Maning Ravanera ran for Congress in the last election and
for city councilor before that. He was referring to Sulog, that new opposition group convened by Atty. Butch Bagabuyo and
Atty. Fred Gapuz which is short for Socialist Union of Local Opposition Groups.
Comes now Atty. Augusto "Titot" Neri, the barangay chair
perceived by many to be part of the political opposition and he said to me that "I cannot see eye-to-eye with Butch Bagabuyo,
so I did not attend. Besides, I was not invited by them to attend." So, one fact comes out, the ‘‘United Opposition’’
is not united at all because many were not even invited. Probably, they consider Atty. Titot Neri not to be a "socialist"
to fit into Sulog.
And what about Atty. Ed Tamandong? This good man ran for
mayor of Cagayan de Oro in the last elections against Mayor Dongkoy Emano and lost. Sulog claimed that Atty. Ed Tamondong
already gave his support to the Sulog cause. He declined the invitation, he said. Again, we could surmise of the reasons,
which are many.
And Atty. Manolo Tagarda Sr., the former mayor-by-ascension
of Cagayan de Oro. He did not accept the invitation to attend the Sulog affair last Saturday. He has his own battles to wage
in the political arena. And he is reportedly rooting for Councilor Zaldy Ocon as his mayoral bet for 2007. Kag. Ocon also
did not attend the Sulog meeting. And this speaks much of the rift within the opposition ranks, more particularly in the Sulog
organization.
And what has Atty. Jun Pepito to say of Sulog? Jun Pepito
also ran for mayor in the city in the last elections. His absence at the Sulog meeting speaks a thousand words. Did his absence
there make the Sulog leaders’ hearts go fonder? Probably not.
Surely, Atty. Tony Soriano, the former vice mayor of Cagayan
de Oro, was prominently present. And so were a few barangay leaders, including the has-beens and the ‘‘ex-future’’
barangay chairs, those who had been dreaming all their lives but never got to the post.
But then, again, as I have observed in the past, the opposition
cannot ever get their acts together. There will always be one reason or another to get them splintered and divided. There
are always personal animosities and deep-rooted vendettas to prevent all into breaking bread at the opposition caucuses.
Now Sulog is dreaming that they could muster or gather
10,000 people to attend its launch on Aug. 25. Maybe, if they count with them the fiesta revelers who flock to our growing
city every fiesta time, then they could say that the terminals and airport and ports are full of people because these people
did not come here for the fiesta on Aug. 26, 27 and 28 but for the Sulog launch on Aug. 25. What a coincidence. But people
won’t believe them.
Atty. Maning Ravanera and Atty. Titot Neri and Atty. Tamondong
and Atty. Tagarda Sr. and Atty. Jun Pepito are but few of the learned and experienced ones who saw this early the futility
of the Sulog effort. The people who attended last Saturday’s Philtown meeting were more on the observers’ side.
Some even suggested that many of those who attended were "spies" of Mayor Dongkoy Emano. But, really, no one is sure if it
is true that the ranks of Sulog are all for the genuine opposition. Politics is always a hornet’s nest of vested interests.
And of spies.
Sulog, according to my compare Maning Ravanera, is bound
to fail. Maybe, his political nemesis Dean Manny Jaudian agrees with him as Jaudian often agrees with Atty. Titot Neri, his
beer-buddy.
And these lawyers’ reactions I cited are prevalent
in the city. Even non-lawyers hold the same opinion of Sulog. Some may even think worse.
I am not questioning the intentions behind Sulog for I
believe in democracy. I am doubting their means. And I am certainly predicting their outcome. Just like Maning Ravanera, I
think Sulog will fail soon, very soon, in uniting the opposition. That is because, in 2007, the opposition cannot anymore
be united. It is too late in the day to unite. It is too late for Sulog to move on. Sorry, but too late already.
Of tourism, beggars and scratch-car boys
By Joe Pallugna / July 19,
2006
I WAS elated to have heard Mayor Dongkoy Emano declare
over Bombo Radyo that one of his intended legacies for Cagayan de Oro City is tourism promotion.
That is why he is pushing heaven and earth to have the
international white-water rafting competition held here.
And that is why he has also encouraged investors to help
turn Cagayan de Oro into the Convention City of the Philippines.
True to his word, the national conventions of Rotarians,
Masons, Sorotimists, Jaycees, Lions, architects, engineers, dentists and almost every organization or association you could
name have had their conventions here in the past eight years.
In fact, the national convention of the Integrated Bar
of the Philippines (IBP) will be held here next year. That was after Baguio City hosted the national convention of all lawyers
last year. After Baguio City, we are the next host. And we are proud!
But what destroys all the efforts of Mayor Emano are the
patent, direct and clear irritants––a shame actually––that pervade the streets of our city. The daily
presence of the ironically opposite image we all want to project.
I am referring to the few kinks that are ever-present and
ever-shameful. Ever-irritating and ever-offensive.
One is the presence of beggars on many street-crossings.
No one can deny this!
Take the Licoan-Highway crossing near the UCCP church and
the provincial capitol park at Velez Street corner C.M. Recto Avenue. Beggars abound when the traffic lights turn red.
Take also the C.M. Recto corner Osmeņa avenues near the
Coca-Cola plant. Then take the Kauswagan-National Highway crossing near Makro and the Pelaez Street corner National Highway
near Ororama Mega Center. Beggars not only knock on car windows. They also scratch the car sides and knock off the side mirrors
if you don’t give them any money. They harass commuters and drivers.
I have experienced these a number of times and I have received
and heard numerous complaints from car owners on these beggars in our city’s midst. Why are beggars getting control
of our streets? Are these part of tourism promotion? Certainly, they are not!
And take also the very valid complaint of Atty. Taumaturgo
Macabinlar, the soft-spoken and amiable clerk of court of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 20, about the "watch-car boys"
that abound in our convention city.
They harass car owners into "watching" the cars otherwise,
if you refuse to give money, you will find scratches on your car the next time you park. These bastards of "watch car boys"
have perfect memories of those who bleed with their money and those who do not when they park their cars in front of Mercury
Drug at Divisoria.
These "scratch car boys" also abound in front of Dunkin
Donuts and near R.A.Uy Appliance Center and DBP at Divisoria, all around the new Cogon Market, and at Ororama-Cogon and Mega
Center. Also at Xavier University, at the Cagayan de Oro Airport parking lots, even at Cathedral and Gaston Park, and in many
other places.
They are very insistent, irritating and very destructive.
Very destructive. Very destructive to property and to tourism. Very destructive to our souls.
I really hope Mayor Dongkoy Emano’s CSWD, RTA, City
Planning, City Tourism and the police officials will take these observations very seriously and very soon. Very, very soon!
That soon means before I kill a boy, and many times they
are grown men (not boys) and women (others bringing small kids as props). Killing out of anger and frustration.
And I am not alone. Believe me, I am not alone.
Many of our citizens are very angry.
Indeed, tourism does not start nor end in infrastructure
nor tourist spots nor convention centers nor brochures and sales pitches. Nor of the very matters that kill tourism.
Tourism also takes the basic spirit of contentment and
peace of mind of the people. Of happiness and good-naturedness of the citizenry. Of peace and security of the residents.
And, indeed, the presence of beggars and "scratch-car boys"
are the anathema to all these.
Unless we solve these itchy but persistent problems, the
efforts at tourism promotion of our Good Mayor Dongkoy will all go to vain.
Unless we act, we all lose in the end.
Unless we act now, or never!
Fare wars
By Joe Pallugna / July 10,
2006
WHY is there a need for regulated fare for buses, taxis
and jeepneys?
The answers are both on public policy and economic practicability.
The question has been raised in view of the fares that
one bus company, Super 5, has been charging. Its fares for the Cagayan de Oro-Iligan or Cagayan de Oro-Bukidnon routes, vice
versa, are too low. In comparison, Rural Transit Mindanao Inc. (RTMI) charges more based on the rates set by the government.
The question basically is whether the riding public benefits
if the fares are very low. Of course, that is true at first glance.
However, as Director Mandangan Darimbang of LTFRB-Region
10 has expressed, there is danger if companies charge too low because the safety of the passengers would be compromised. Buses
and jeepneys would not be properly maintained, and expect the use of substandard spare parts, and the lack of proper checks
on oils and brake linings and other safety checks.
Brake linings may not be replaced as needed. Changing engine
oil and brakes may not be done. Tires would be so worn out but still these would be used just to reduce maintenance costs.
Lower fares may result in maintenance cost-cutting. This
is the downside of very low bus or jeepney fares.
And this is so true!
That’s why the LTFRB has to conduct public hearings
on fares for buses and jeepneys to ascertain the true, economically viable and truly safe fares.
Indeed, there is no substitute when it comes to the general
safety of the riding public. When the competition becomes so cut-throat, the safety of the passengers would certainly suffer
all the more. That is why the state has police powers and it can regulate franchises as a way of raising the standards of
our public transport vehicles.
Finally, the smaller bus or jeepney companies would never
survive in the long run if the fares are so low.
For example, if you only have two or five jeepneys or buses,
your costs in maintaining a repair shop would be so high. You need to pay welders, mechanics or painter, drivers and conductors.
However, if you have 200 buses or some 50 jeepneys or 100 taxis, you would be able to easly afford to hire welders, mechanics
and painters. This is simply economics. Spare parts and oils, lubricants and diesel or gasoline fuel could be purchased in
bulk and they are then definitely cheaper.
Thus, in the long run, the smaller jeepney or bus or taxi
operator would suffer more if fares are set too low or are not regulated. There is logic in regulating the fares and in apprehending
those who only think of temporary profits without ever considering the long-term negative effects that the very low fares
would cause not only on the transport sector but on the general safety of the riding public as well.
Large companies with huge capital and extended resources
would kill smaller operators and plunge smaller public transport firms into banruptcy. That is the long-term effect of non-regulation.
That is the point of state regulation on public transport
fares. Stop the undercharging of fares and let the people, the general riding public understand and know the truth.
Doing so would serve the greatest good for the greatest
number of people. Let us not be blinded by the false publicity.
Let’s have public hearings extensively on public
transport fares. And, after the public hearings, impose the law even how harsh it is.
Don’t be duped and misled by sensationalized issues
on very low fares. Let us be realistic and practical.
Let’s have public hearings and have respect for the
law.
Otherwise the riding public suffers the more in the end.
An officer and a gentleman
By Joe Pallugna / June 26,
2006
YOU can’t really put a good man down. To all of Police
Supt. Antonio C. Montalba’s critics, here’s one for the books. On June 22, 2006 at the famous Manila Hotel, Tony
Montalba received the 2006 Outstanding Professional of the Year Award in the field of criminology.
This Award is granted by the Professional Regulation Commission
annually after a very thorough search nationwide. As the congratulatory message sent to Montalba by Leonor Tripon-Rosero,
the Chairperson of the PRC Awards Committee said: ‘‘The Outstanding Professional of the Year Award is the highest
award bestowed by the commission upon a professional as recommended by his peers for having demonstrated exceptional professional
competence and integrity in the practice of his profession; participated meaningfully in professional activities through the
professional organization contributed significantly to the advancement of the profession and to the effective discharge of
the profession’s social responsibility through the meaningful contribution/participation in socio-civic related activities."
The award carries the privilege of promotion one rank higher
in the police hierarchy. So Tony the police lieutenant colonel is now a full-fledged colonel. Those used to calling Tony as
major should start getting used to address him as colonel.
From police superintendent, Tony is now a police senior
superintendent. We in Cagayan de Oro should be proud of Tony Montalba for being recognized nationwide by the Professional
Regulation Commission. Tony, the most maligned police officer, the often-ridiculed and often-criticized man by the radio commentators
seeking attention from their listeners, have proven them all wrong.
This silent and low-profile man had his due recognition
in a national award. And a one-rank promotion that goes with it. And the award proves that there is really no substitute for
hard work. And that respect is earned and not demanded.
And everyone should realize that he is a rank away from
becoming a brigadier general (chief superintendent). So that when another feather is added to Tony’s cap in the coming
years, it would be one star. The star of a general.
So we should seriously take Tony Montalba in the business
of police work. He has shown his mettle as a dedicated police officer. He has shown courage amidst the challenges. He has
stood tall amidst the criticisms. He has proven himself worthy in the field of criminology. The PRC held so and we cannot
help but agree.
And when his good deeds are added on and counted in the
years to come, we will be proud once more to have an officer and a gentleman in our ranks.
One that deserves the rank of general.
To Antonio Montalba, my salute!
You really deserve to be a General!
Stop the market raids
By Joe Pallugna / June 12, 2006
I LISTENED to my car radio two Thursday evenings ago, driving through
heavy rains and I really felt sorry for the vendors whose stalls at the new Cogon market were raided by policemen for selling
fake or pirated DVDs and CDs.
Some radio reporters insinuated that the raiders were looking for
copies of the Da Vinci Code. Oh, no. Not again!
If the vendors selling pirated DVDs had been selling their wares all
over the country for so many years, why raid the Cogon market vendors just now? Is it really the Da Vinci Code that
triggered the raids?
I cannot blame the policemen who conducted the raids since they were
only following orders from their highers-up. The chain of command made them do it. But who ordered the top brass to order
their underlings to raid the Cogon market shops?
Some holier-than-thou who wanted to impress the Roman Catholic Church?
Or some political wannabe who wanted to impress Malacaņang? And why single out the Cogon market and Divisoria sidewalk vendors?
Why not the shopping malls where pirated DVDs are also widely displayed and sold?
Certainly, lots of questions and raised eyebrows resulted from the
Thursday raids. Everyone knows these shops sell all kinds of fake and pirated tapes, CDs and DVDs. Many other shops also sell
fake Coach and Fendi and other signature or branded bags. Fake wrist watches bearing popular brands like Rado
and Rolex are also sold. So are fake Lacoste and Giordano shirts and other branded products. Even fake
transistor radio batteries.
There are even fake products bearing the popular brands of coffee,
creams, milk, shampoo, cigarettes and food items, shoes and just about anything.
If we raid one, we raid all.
But if we do this, almost all the shops and businesses in any city
in the Philippines would be closed. Almost all shops and malls sell something fake, or an imitation, or a pirated copy of
a song or movie or a mislabeled product. Cagayan de Oro is not an exception.
I remember with a sense of humor the street hawkers in Shanghai who
sell fake Rolex wrist watches with noisy shouts of "Rolik! Rolik!’’ But to evade arrests, they don’t
carry the wrist watches. Instead, they show cartolina-sized papers with pictures of the wrist watches and the prices. Just
like a restaurant menu. And when you seem interested, they’d pull you to some street corner or stall and show you hundreds
of watches to choose from. And the bargaining beings.
And the Philippines is not the only copycat of Shanghai or any Chinese
city. Thailand and Hongkong and Singapore also have fake products havens. They even have more!
So when the rains abated and the policemen have boarded their vehicles
with the confiscated products, I got off my car and went among the closed shops. Outside were women, mothers and wives, crying
their hearts out for the misfortune that just befell them.
I pitied them. Their wares were taken by the raiders. Their businesses
gone.
All because of the Da Vinci Code fake DVDs? I really hope not.
I really hope the motive for the raids was to enforce anti-piracy and Intellectual Property Rights laws.
Otherwise, these vendors would again go on other more illegal and
more harmful trades like you know what.
And I hope these raids would stop. Let’s concentrate first on
stopping the distribution of shabu and marijuana, the string of broad daylight robberies, the murders and rapes and banditry,
the smuggling through the piers and airports, the non-payment of taxes or the carnappings and hold-ups. These are directly
destructive crimes.
But raiding DVD traders and hawkers is the least priority, if I am
to opine. Let us even concentrate more on urban squatters and land grabbers. They destroy businesses and violate landowners’
rights.
If only government officials, especially those based in Manila who
ordered the raids, realize how small profits these DVD traders make in a day. If only they realize that these vendors tend
their stores 12 hours a day and shell out capital of thousands of pesos.
And when these vendors make money through their daily sales, then
we should be happy that they have food on their tables, milk for their babies and send their children to school and avoid
more nefarious trades.
As has been said, between two evils, I’ll choose the lesser
evil. I’m sure selling pirated DVDs and CDs is an evil. But that is a lesser evil than the many worst evils we all know
about.
Pity these stall holders. Stop the raid and shift our resources and
efforts on the shabu and marijuana trades. Go after big-time robbers and smugglers and organized crime syndicates. They are
worst.
I beg. Stop the raids of the market stalls. They bring us nothing
good. They only destroy what is already an almost hopeless situation. Believe me. The raids are more destructive in the long
run than the other evils sought to be remedied.
The losers among us
By Joe Pallugna / May 29, 2006
I WAS in Manila last week for some cases and I checked into a hotel
in the Ermita area of old Manila.
My return flight to Cagayan de Oro being at 4:55 early dawn, I have
to wake up at 2:30 a.m. so I could be at the airport at 3:30 a.m. to pass through long queues at the security checks of the
domestic terminal.
So I have had enough of watching TV and looked through the window
of my hotel room. I had a vantage point and observed human activity at about 10 in the evening.
The neon lights of Ermita amused me. One KTV bar had a flashing neon
light in the form of a big green and blue star. As if Christmas never ends in that bar.
And I saw GROs going to work in their flimsiest attire and I wondered
if they dressed that way already when they left their cramped boarding houses and rode on their "suki" taxis to the bars they
report to on MWF or T-Th or Sat-Sun schedules. Ha! Just like college students with fixed class schedules!
I also saw the security guards on each of the establishments yawning,
smoking, and talking to each other oblivious to what’s happening at the KTV bars they are supposed to secure. Since
there are KTV bars as close to one another as every five meters, the security guards were aplenty.
And some people are selling chicken barbeque. No, not just chicken
legs and breasts, they also sell grilled chicken feet (Adidas), chicken necks, heads, gizzard, liver and intestines! If only
feathers could be sold. The whole live chicken could give money to the cook for all it’s really worth.
But so much of the chicken and the KTV bars. What really caught my
attention––and I’m dead serious on this––are the small children playing hide-and-seek on the
streets,
I saw young girls aged three and five years old. Young boys from three
to 12 years of age are still on the streets a couple of hours before midnight. Playing, playing, and playing. Just as oblivious
to their surroundings like the security guards and the grilled chicken-part vendors and baloteros and cigarette hawkers.
The vendors and pimps and GROs and security guards are all grown-ups,
many are adults. But how about these kindergarten-age kids?
What alarmed me was the fact that these very young kids could have
been used already at so early stage in their lives, what with the existence of pimps and GROs and night owls in their neighborhoods.
When GROs in their sexy outfits and outrageous get-ups passed by,
these boys and girls didn’t even turn their heads nor stare at the women like they are not normally dressed people.
They looked so normal and unobtrusive to the kids.
So I really wondered what would these kids think when they grow up.
Their parents would be nowhere when they reach 16 or 18 years old. What happens when they don’t finish college and don’t
find noble work?
Getting into drugs, staying at every night way past midnight, putting
on extravagant face powders and lipsticks and scanty clothing and selling their only natural resources––their
bodies––or buying others if they could afford it. All these would come naturally as these kids would grow up in
such sorry environs.
And the concept of nature and nurture came up in my mind when I thought
about the future of those children who are already disadvantaged very early in life. Nature is your genetic composition.
Nurture is your environment where you grew up.
If this nature-nurture theory is correct, then you know ahead where
these Ermita kids are going to, save a few exceptions and lucky ones. To the environment they grow up with these kids will
blend into.
I am not making conclusions here. Nor am I being arrogant nor self-righteous.
I wrote this article when I came back to Cagayan de Oro because I wasn’t able to sleep on the plane flight. I kept thinking
of those Ermita kids.
And they are not alone. They abound all over the country.
There are always losers and winners, I know. And there are more
losers than winners.On the night in Ermita, I think I know in great part why. Such are the harsh realities of life. And they
would never end. That for sure, I know.
Of cellphones and more
By Joe Pallugna / May 23, 2006
I HAD my first cellular phone in 1985 from Pilipino Telepono Corp.
or Piltel. It was a simple gadget that allowed me instant call access even while driving my car.
Text messaging then was unavailable.
It was a marvelous technology that helped accelerate businesses. It
helped me a lot in my law practice as I could call my law office and dictate some tasks or inquire some matters from my office
staff.
My clients could call me on Friday nights or Saturdays and Sundays
to bail out their children or relatives or to file complaints even when my law office was closed.
Then came text messaging and later cellphones with cameras and texts
and pictures could be sent instantly. They also allow people to hook on to the Internet and send or obtain e-mails by wireless
technology.
But, as with any technological advancement and new gadget, it can
be abused and misused. Kidnappers send ransom demands by text messages. Pedophiles text and seduce young boys and nubile girls
and succeed in their criminal acts. Carnappers communicate with their victims with pictures of the cars and demand "storage
fees" just like "board-and-lodging" demanded by kidnappers. And all other forms of criminal and immoral activities result
from cellular phone abuse and misuse.
But even of extreme importance cellphone use had become to many of
us, it still is not an indispensable gadget.
Many people I know do not have cellphones and yet are able to do business
successfully or practice their professions with ease and effectiveness.
For one, I have a client who owns or partly owns a string of big hotels
in Cagayan de Oro, Bohol, Cebu, Bukidnon, and Misamis Oriental. Yet, he never owned nor used a cellphone! Living proof of
a life without cellphones. Ironically, his wife owns two and his four children own the best ones.
A couple of older lawyers also do not have cellphones. The reason
of one is that his eyesight and forgetfulness of how to use it prevents him from using a cellphone.
Another lawyer said he refused to use a cellphone because it intrudes
into his private time with unwanted calls. A sheriff I know does not have a cellphone because his wife prevented him from
having one.
A couple of businessmen I know refused to use cellphones so their
wives would not know of their whereabouts at all times. I know they have trysts even during daytime.
Some mayors even don’t carry cellphones. Only their aides do.
This prevents them from being reached by people with unsolicited advice, unwelcome calls, intrigues and even false solicitations.
Of priests, however, I don’t know. Probably they ought to all
have cellphones so that confessions and acts of contritions by parishioners could be easily made 24 hours a day, seven days
a week.
And doctors, too! They should be accessible 24/7. They should be since
the lives of people depend on them, especially since our emergency hotline, like 911 in the US, is not that accessible fully
nor very efficient.
I’m sure President GMA has many cellphones. So did ex-Comelec
Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano. Their cellphones almost caused GMA’s political collapse. So did the cellphones of
a former provincial governor.
But, as any technological advancement may present, the inventions
of cellphones with all its varied uses has helped mankind advance faster and made many life-saving services more accessible.
Their misuse and abuse is a matter of personal choice. And the benefits
are far numerous than their advantages.
One clear victim though is spelling.
Our kids would certainly fail in spelling bees and contests as they
often misspell almost all the words in their texts.
And frequent texting cause a spelling failure. Habit makes perfect
the ability to misspell and shorten words in a sentence. Thank you becomes "tnx." Good morning becomes "gud am." Is this the
new generation of spelling and communication?
I hope it is and it stops here. I hope it won’t get worse. For
if it will, our lives will be eaten by the evil effects of technology and our lives will become more miserable instead of
getting better.
I hope. I really hope.
A bridge too far
By Joe Pallugna / May 16, 2006
THE title of this article was culled from a Reader’s Digest
condensed feature I read when I was about 12 years old. It was written by Cornelius Ryan, if my memory serves me right.
It was about World War II; it portrayed a very graphic account of
the struggle to win a war, with a bridge as the strategic point of victory.
But the present situation in Cagayan de Oro portrays an entirely different
story. Although with a bridge just the same as the subject of an extreme crisis and of an eventual victory for our people.
I’m writing, in part of the Carmen Bridge, which few know as
Ysalina Bridge. Now it is closed to public use because engineers are restrengthening its basic structures.
The closure of the Ysalina Bridge has caused chaos, anger, frustration
and all sorts of emotional distress in addition to economic hardships and added costs of travel. It is even used as a political
issue!
The temporary closure of Ysalina Bridge is a subject we have to accept,
a topic we have to fathom. A matter we have to reckon with.
As any Clark-Hatch fan knows, no pain, no gain. We have to bear certain
pains and burdens and inconveniences to be able to achieve certain joys, or gains, or benefits, or safety measures.
And so the re-routing of jeepney routes are matters of fact we have
to bear with, to accept and to adjust to.
Why only now? Because we have been procrastinating of the repairs.
We put it off for another day, another time. But the time has come.
And now we realize why Pelaez Bridge is a bridge too far. Or so we
thought then. Or so we criticized. What good is that Pelaez Bridge if it is a bridge too far?
Now we realize its importance. Its all-too-valuable usefulness and
its all-to-realistic advantage.
Imagine if Ysalina Bridge collapsed and many of our relatives and
friends died and all that was left is the new bridge at the national highway. Imagine what chaos and monstrous traffic jams
resulted of just that single bridge to traverse over.
But now that we have the Pelaez Bridge at Barangay Taguanao, we have,
at least, half of the chaos solved.
Indeed, the traffic jams would still be terrible. The 9 am-6 pm work
schedule of city hall may ease the anxiety of the city hall employees and give them a one-hour reprieve. But that is not adequate,
I know.
Tensions would still arise among the employees and their children
when schools open in June. Hardships certainly will arise and blood pressures will rise.
But then again, we have to bear with all these to make sure that Carmen
Bridge is safe and secure for everyone to pass through. That it is as safe as it could be. So the repairs are a must. Repairs
of Ysalina Bridge are needed for Cagayan de Oro to progress.
And so, whatever qualms of anger or inconvenience or blame we bear
with Mayor Emano, let’s all set them aside in the spirit of safety and progress.
The bridge at Taguanao might be a bridge too far but it is a bridge
that we have and no other. It is the only alternative to the Marcos Bridge.
A bridge too far is still a bridge too useful.
Let’s all thank the city government for that bridge. It serves
us right at the very moment of no other alternative.
Yes, the Pelaez Bridge is a bridge too far. Yet, in the present circumstances,
it is a bridge too near. In fact, it is a bridge with no other.
Thank everyone for it.
On the call to ban 'Da Vinci'
By Joe Pallugna / April 24, 2006
THE recent renewed raves against The Da Vinci Code, the movie
as adapted from the bestseller book by Dan Brown, is much ado about nothing.
Someone suggested that, if he has his ways, he would ban the showing
of the movie in our city. He would not have the movie shown in movie houses. But what about the pirated DVDs that would proliferate
at Cogon market?
Banning the movie would just flare up the curiosity of the viewing
public. Look what happened to the Bulua Sex Scandal and the XU Sex Scandal videos. They sold like hotcakes and
at exorbitant prices. They became bestsellers like The Da Vinci Code of Dan Brown, the book. But after a while, when
the voyeuristic desires had been satiated, the issues died down like any ordinary video.
The main issue, however, in banning The Da Vinci Code movie
from the theaters is borne not out of the genuine desire to protect the Catholics from the alleged false depictions of Jesus
Christ. Rather, it is based on the insecurity of some people of their faith in Christ and of their lack of understanding of
the truth behind the matter of faith in their God.
I’m sure no priest would claim that the doctrines and teachings
of the Church would be eroded or even debased because one author, and a movie producer, depicted the story that Jesus Christ
was married to Mary Magdalene and even had children with her. Or that the Holy Grail was not the cup used at the Last Supper
but were the bones of Mary Magdalene.
Certainly, the centuries-old teaching of the Catholic Church cannot
be lessened by a mere book and a movie. The Catholic Church is more than that. And not the stories and fables on the Order
of the Knights Templar, or of the Masonry, of which many Catholics are members, could erode the people’s faith in God.
To ban the movie would be going too far and too out of bounds. There
were movies before like Jesus Christ Superstar that became the subject of fierce opposition. Many called the movie
a blasphemy. But could there be blasphemy committed by people claiming a fact different from that which had been traditionally
believed in? I don’t think so.
So when the so-called ‘‘Gospel of Judas’’
presents another angle on the life of Judas, the disciple who betrayed his Master, by depicting him as a man marked by fate
to betray Jesus so that mankind can be redeemed from sin, is that not also a blasphemy if we go by the logic of those claiming
to ban The Da Vinci Code?
Church history is full of instances where what have been accepted
as fact or gospel truth were later on proven wrong, if not later on abandoned as baseless claims. Remember the issue on the
need to baptize small children so that their souls would not stay in limbo, or in purgatory, if they die without being baptized
because these babies have been brushed with the Original Sin? That issue has been laid to rest by the present Pope who wrote,
years earlier when he was not yet The Pope and in one of his dissertations, that such particular belief is not gospel truth.
It is not correct. Children are innocent souls. No baptism is needed to bring their souls to heaven if they die.
What should best be done in this present day is to allow our children
to see the film and to discuss it after. Like a movie review and analysis that we used to do in college. Not only would it
hold a firmer anchor on our belief in Jesus, it would also provide a good opportunity for the parents to bond with their children
some more and open the line of inter-family communications even more.
Banning a film is a baseless and dangerous precedent. If you can’t
stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. That they used to say. Hence, if you have the feeling that the Da Vinci Code
is blasphemous, then stay away from the movies and go to church instead. But by imposing one’s biases, insecurities
or misconceptions on others, that is going back to the old days of the inquisition, or of the Dark Ages or of the Crusaders
when the Church’s soldiers attacked viciously and killed the unbelievers, all falsely, in the name of God.
We are now in a freer and more tolerant society. That is because people
now are better informed, and more secure in their religious beliefs. Whatever religious scruples we may have on other’s
actions, writings or movie productions, let us keep them to our selves. It is in imposing our own personal beliefs on others
that we become un-christian. We become bigots and religious tyrants. We become the antithesis of the true Christian Faith.
See The Da Vinci Code if you want. Don’t go if you feel
uneasy. But, please, don’t talk of banning the film. It would just make more curious Christians flock to the theaters.
|
|